<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Tech Tonic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techtonic.info/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techtonic.info</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Orkut FTW 5: Websites for photo printing by Nel</title>
		<link>http://www.techtonic.info/2008/04/28/orkut-ftw-5-websites-for-photo-printing/#comment-1008</link>
		<dc:creator>Nel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techtonic.info/2008/04/28/orkut-ftw-5-websites-for-photo-printing/#comment-1008</guid>
		<description>Am a part of this community and really,this thread is just awesome :)

Great technology deals updated regularly
http://brillantdeals.in</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am a part of this community and really,this thread is just awesome <img src='http://www.techtonic.info/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Great technology deals updated regularly<br />
<a href="http://brillantdeals.in" rel="nofollow">http://brillantdeals.in</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nothing Office-ial About It ! by Ankur Banerjee</title>
		<link>http://www.techtonic.info/2008/09/17/nothing-office-ial-about-it/#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator>Ankur Banerjee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techtonic.info/2008/09/17/nothing-office-ial-about-it/#comment-594</guid>
		<description>PS - The site is http://symphony.lotus.com. And by beta I meant for Ubuntu. Windows version is ready.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS - The site is <a href="http://symphony.lotus.com" rel="nofollow">http://symphony.lotus.com</a>. And by beta I meant for Ubuntu. Windows version is ready.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nothing Office-ial About It ! by Ankur Banerjee</title>
		<link>http://www.techtonic.info/2008/09/17/nothing-office-ial-about-it/#comment-593</link>
		<dc:creator>Ankur Banerjee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techtonic.info/2008/09/17/nothing-office-ial-about-it/#comment-593</guid>
		<description>http://www.iso.org/iso/pressrelease.htm?refid=Ref1123

ISO has already approved MS OOXML to be an ISO standard.

OpenOffice sucks, but I think what you should look out for is IBM's Lotus Symphony. It's in beta stage right now, but it's billed as a replacement for OpenOffice (although the base is OpenOffice code). It has some nifty features - like the ability to open documents in tabs. You could open a spreadsheet in one tab, and a document in another tab in the SAME window. It also has a context-sensitive editing sidebar (somewhat similar in theory to the Office '07 Ribbon). You should check it out. It's beta, so there are a few rough edges, but it's light years ahead of OpenOffice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.iso.org/iso/pressrelease.htm?refid=Ref1123" rel="nofollow">http://www.iso.org/iso/pressrelease.htm?refid=Ref1123</a></p>
<p>ISO has already approved MS OOXML to be an ISO standard.</p>
<p>OpenOffice sucks, but I think what you should look out for is IBM&#8217;s Lotus Symphony. It&#8217;s in beta stage right now, but it&#8217;s billed as a replacement for OpenOffice (although the base is OpenOffice code). It has some nifty features - like the ability to open documents in tabs. You could open a spreadsheet in one tab, and a document in another tab in the SAME window. It also has a context-sensitive editing sidebar (somewhat similar in theory to the Office &#8216;07 Ribbon). You should check it out. It&#8217;s beta, so there are a few rough edges, but it&#8217;s light years ahead of OpenOffice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Facing The Google-y by Ravi Pundit</title>
		<link>http://www.techtonic.info/2008/09/03/facing-the-google-y/#comment-559</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravi Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 17:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techtonic.info/2008/09/03/facing-the-google-y/#comment-559</guid>
		<description>Must say,for someone who claims to be the Guru of techjournalism, you hardly get any comments. Poor interface, marketing or writing which one is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Must say,for someone who claims to be the Guru of techjournalism, you hardly get any comments. Poor interface, marketing or writing which one is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Social NOTworking ? by anothr user</title>
		<link>http://www.techtonic.info/2008/08/13/social-notworking/#comment-375</link>
		<dc:creator>anothr user</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 05:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techtonic.info/2008/08/13/social-notworking/#comment-375</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Anothr feed track -Tech Tonic...&lt;/strong&gt;

One new subscriber from Anothr Alerts...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Anothr feed track -Tech Tonic&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>One new subscriber from Anothr Alerts&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hack Jobs All Around! by Tech Tonic &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 8 Years of Tech Un-savviness</title>
		<link>http://www.techtonic.info/2007/07/30/hack-jobs-all-around/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech Tonic &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 8 Years of Tech Un-savviness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 22:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techtonic.info/2007/07/30/hack-jobs-all-around/#comment-218</guid>
		<description>[...] 2001: The tragi-comic case of India&#8217;s &#8216;first cyber crime&#8217; that was &#8216;cracked&#8216; by the Mumbai cops.  The lunacy of it all is best summed up in this Wired story. (A recounting of my personal experiences for a column is here.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2001: The tragi-comic case of India&#8217;s &#8216;first cyber crime&#8217; that was &#8216;cracked&#8216; by the Mumbai cops.  The lunacy of it all is best summed up in this Wired story. (A recounting of my personal experiences for a column is here.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 8 Years of Tech Un-savviness by Abhi</title>
		<link>http://www.techtonic.info/2008/03/08/8-years-of-tech-un-savviness/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Abhi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 20:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techtonic.info/2008/03/08/8-years-of-tech-un-savviness/#comment-204</guid>
		<description>Fair enough, you have a gripe with VoIP coverage though since you seem to be an expert, the rule of thumb is that anything you know well, the mass media's coverage of it will look poor!

As for your original comment saying that the reporting was flawed, I definitely take issue with it! The original CNBC report to which Tech 2.0 referred said that the MHA was not available for comment.

That was breaking news - a reporter doesn't hold back a story he's sure of, waiting for officaldom to respond. Subsequent reports confirm everything mentioned in the report was true!

Nevertheless thanks for taking the time to comment and engage in debate!

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough, you have a gripe with VoIP coverage though since you seem to be an expert, the rule of thumb is that anything you know well, the mass media&#8217;s coverage of it will look poor!</p>
<p>As for your original comment saying that the reporting was flawed, I definitely take issue with it! The original CNBC report to which Tech 2.0 referred said that the MHA was not available for comment.</p>
<p>That was breaking news - a reporter doesn&#8217;t hold back a story he&#8217;s sure of, waiting for officaldom to respond. Subsequent reports confirm everything mentioned in the report was true!</p>
<p>Nevertheless thanks for taking the time to comment and engage in debate!</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 8 Years of Tech Un-savviness by Aswath</title>
		<link>http://www.techtonic.info/2008/03/08/8-years-of-tech-un-savviness/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Aswath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 20:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techtonic.info/2008/03/08/8-years-of-tech-un-savviness/#comment-203</guid>
		<description>I feel that you are mischaracterize my comment. I did not say that there has been no instance of stupidity on the part of sarkari (as you state in your comment in GigaOm). My original comment was the reporting was flawed. On this point, you do not take issue with me. I stated and continue to maintain that Indian press in general, tech press in particular is shoddy in its reporting. They are more like opinion pieces.

I am not sure the significance of these instances. To repeat, the point of contention is not smartness of government officials; instead the point is professionalism of Indian press. My exposure of Indian press is only related to VoIP matters and on that topc, I given them failing grade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel that you are mischaracterize my comment. I did not say that there has been no instance of stupidity on the part of sarkari (as you state in your comment in GigaOm). My original comment was the reporting was flawed. On this point, you do not take issue with me. I stated and continue to maintain that Indian press in general, tech press in particular is shoddy in its reporting. They are more like opinion pieces.</p>
<p>I am not sure the significance of these instances. To repeat, the point of contention is not smartness of government officials; instead the point is professionalism of Indian press. My exposure of Indian press is only related to VoIP matters and on that topc, I given them failing grade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hurricane Ballmer by Abhi</title>
		<link>http://www.techtonic.info/2005/01/01/hurricane-ballmer/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Abhi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 19:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techtonic.info/2005/01/01/hurricane-ballmer/#comment-202</guid>
		<description>Of course the REAL story behind the story is here:
http://www.tehelka.com/story_main10.asp?filename=Bu010105is_mda.asp

I think MDA got so flustered that he diverted attention to the ownership issue :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course the REAL story behind the story is here:<br />
<a href="http://www.tehelka.com/story_main10.asp?filename=Bu010105is_mda.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.tehelka.com/story_main10.asp?filename=Bu010105is_mda.asp</a></p>
<p>I think MDA got so flustered that he diverted attention to the ownership issue <img src='http://www.techtonic.info/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Community by Tech Tonic &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Orkut FTW 7: How to dispose off old audio cassettes and VHS?</title>
		<link>http://www.techtonic.info/community/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech Tonic &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Orkut FTW 7: How to dispose off old audio cassettes and VHS?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 23:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techtonic.info/community/#comment-186</guid>
		<description>[...] Community [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Community [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
